Reasoning Models
Reasoning models are LLMs trained to do extended step-by-step thinking before they answer, spending more compute at inference to work through hard problems. They trade latency and cost for accuracy on math, code, and multi-step logic.
Also known as: reasoning model
A standard model produces its answer in one pass. A reasoning model is trained to generate an internal chain of thought first — exploring, checking, and revising — before committing to a response, effectively spending more compute at inference time on harder problems. On math, coding, and multi-step logic, that extra “thinking” measurably raises accuracy.
The trade-off is direct: more reasoning means more tokens, higher cost, and slower responses. So reasoning models are worth it for hard, high-stakes tasks and overkill for simple ones — the same right-size-the-model logic that applies everywhere. They bake in what chain-of-thought prompting used to coax out of ordinary models, which is why “just think step by step” matters less with them. For how reasoning models fit alongside prompting and test-time compute, see the AI reasoning overview.
Go deeper
From the conversation
-
How DeepSeek Changed the AI Race Overnight -
Why LLMs Are Plausibility Engines, Not Truth Engines | Dan Klein -
Hallucinations Are a Data Architecture Problem | Sudhir Hasbe, Neo4j -
Agent Memory: The Last Battleground in the AI Stack | Richmond Alake, Oracle -
The Making of Gemini 2.0: DeepMind's Approach to AI Development and Deployment | Logan Kilpatrick -
The Critical Infrastructure Behind the AI Boom | Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel -
Beyond Transformers: How Liquid AI Is Rethinking LLM Architecture | Maxime Labonne -
Mastering Multi-Agent Systems | MongoDB’s Mikiko Chandrasekhar